Jonathan T Gilliam

Freedom

It is neither free nor is it obligated to anyone.

Freedom is elusive, yet it has existed since the dawn of man.

People have fought for it, died to preserve it, yet many have declared war to steal it from others.

Freedom is not free.

Service is the cornerstone of freedom.

Service is what keeps a country free, and its citizens motivated. Without service, freedom cannot prevail.

This age old paradox of freedom and service is, in fact, one of the great mysteries of God. You cannot have one without the other.

Freedom without service is dependency. Service without freedom is slavery.

Our founding fathers understood this cycle of life between service and freedom so well that they made it the foundation for our constitution.

Every God given freedom written in our constitution must be ensured by our government. It is the Law.

In other words, our government exists to serve the people.

Yet the government as the founding fathers envisioned it, is the people.

Therefore, we must serve. We must serve our country as though the enemy was crouching at our doorstep, with war dripping from their teeth as they prepare to conquer us and steal our freedom.

We must serve as though our own individual freedom depends on the safety and security of each and every fellow American.

Freedom, as our founding fathers envisioned it, stands in stark contrast to the desires of our modern day world and the majority of its leaders.

History has shown us that those who know not service, will also fail to understand freedom. They will find it mere nonsense.

This conflict between service and freedom also exists within many American citizens and politicians that want us to believe our survival and the success of this great nation depends on government handouts and regulations.

This Progressive Socialist ideology is rooted in dependency and has corrupted our two party political system which now casts aside self responsibility of the individual, and self governance by the people as it leads this country straight to servitude like sheep to the slaughterhouse.

In fact, our greatest national security threat is not Islamic terrorism, it is bad policy that resonates from incompetent, narcissistic politicians and lawyers steeped in Progressive Socialism.

We the People can change this tidal wave of dependency.

We, the People of the United States, must claim our citizenship, look past the politicians and race baiters, and back to the minds and actions of our founding fathers.

Only there will we rediscover our direction and the motivation that created this great and powerful country.

Any politician that tells you our constitution isn’t enough to make all people free is a liar.

Any court justice that tells you our constitution doesn’t fit today’s society and must conform, is a liar.

Any activist on the left or the right that tells you their way is the only right way, is a liar.

We the People are the 1st branch of government, where self governance unites all people.

We the People are responsible for looking out for each other’s freedoms and working our problems out before they get to the courts.

If our issues get to the court, We the People have failed.

When We the People stand united we are a force like no other on earth and the government exists to serve us.

When We the People are divided, we become individual slaves, waiting to be purchased by a master or controlled by an enemy.

We the People must not buy into these lies. There is no liberal or conservative, there is only effective or incompetent.

There are no longer race boundaries and poverty has no hold on you.

The perception that in order to have equal rights you must infringe on the liberty of others, is a lie.

Glass ceilings do not exist and your sexuality does not define who you are.

God loves everyone equally and gives freely to those that ask. Only He has the power to judge sin.

There is no ditch too deep for you to climb out of. There are no walls too high for you to scale.

You are an American.

And together We, are The United States of America.

Jonathan T Gilliam
US Navy SEAL
FBI Special Agent

What's Obama doing???

By John (Jay) Schreiber                                                                  December 29th 2014
I have to write this as it is driving me nuts. It’s about this nut POTUS we are currently living under. Yes I said under. That is just how he sees it. We are beneath him. America is beneath him. He makes these pretty lil speeches that usually sound nice. He talks of how his plan is to make it better for someone. But he NEVER speaks of the consequences of that action. As he tells how this or that is going to improve some group or individuals, he always leaves out the part which is the consequences. What or who will this effect negatively? What problems outside of his lil vision will occur? How many other problems will this action cause? He never talks of that. Why? Because it would interfere with his agenda. No other reason. His and his Administrations agenda.  Well let’s take this little amnesty thing for starters. Oh how he puts it that the poor folks that entered our nation illegally need to have an opportunity to work, pay taxes, and get a pathway to citizenship. Oh, he sounds like a nice guy offering this to these folks that have already broken American laws.  Now let’s just take a look at the consequences of said action. #1) It is just totally unfair to all the folks that paid dearly, worked hard and filed all the paperwork and waited their turn to come here Legally. #2) The cost to taxpayers to extend the educational system to handle the millions of these peoples kids. #3) The welfare system is already over extended for Citizens and cannot handle this increase which has already taxed our system. #4) Jobs, We have millions of Americans out of work and now they are giving millions of illegal individuals work permits. This I see as a purposely created thing to bring about more Welfare users. This is the biggest problem. Tax the welfare system into a crash and see what it does to the nation. It’s well documented as to what happens. In 1966 it was written by Cloward and Piven. It was published in The Nation. It’s called The weight of the Poor: A strategy to end poverty. It’s a strategy to recruit the poor onto welfare rolls to bring down the system. It’s the Progressive Playbook. And by the way, Both Frances Fox Piven and Richard Cloward are devout Communists. But Obama never ever speaks of these things that his ideas (that sound nice) will bring about. He NEVER talks of the consequences of his actions. Now, he is also building a divide between the races and law and order that is as wide as the Grand Canyon.  Why? Because that is how you fundamentally change a Nation. First you crash the economic system by building national debt beyond the ability to ever pay off, then you divide the people by race, financial status. He’s building arrogance against the very ones that secure our laws, the Police. This is what he is doing. 

So, if you are one of the ones that think Obama is a wonderful humanitarian, think twice. As he makes it all warm and fuzzy for Illegal’s, law breakers, individuals with no respect for the law, Remember, it’s you, the American citizen that will ultimately pay the price. Whether your Left wing or Right wing. We The People Will PAY.

Also We have finally reached 18+ trillion of debt. I figured this out while it was 17 trillion so you can add some time to this. At 17 trillion if we get no more debt and pay no interest it will take a bit of time to pay off. At 1 million dollars a day, it will only take 1450+ years to pay off 17 trillion. So enjoy it now, cause we will be paying for it soon enough, and your kids will pay and their kids will pay and so on and so forth.

Here is the original Cloward and Piven Article written in 1966. http://www.thenation.com/article/weight-poor-strategy-end-poverty

Life Under the Victimocracy

Life Under the Victimocracy

The End of Science

The End of Science From Article: Carl Sagan was the country's leading practitioner of the mythologization of science, transforming a process into a philosophy, substituting political agendas for inquiry and arrogance for research. Sagan was often wrong, but it didn't matter because his errors were scientific, rather than ideological or theological. He could be wrong as many times as he wanted, as long as he wasn't wrong politically..

Letter to Speaker Boehner

The Honorable John Boehner Speaker, U.S. House of Representatives The Capitol, H-232 Washington, D.C., 20515 January 6, 2014 Speaker Boehner, We write to express our grave concern over the failure of your House of Representatives to extract the truth from the Obama administration concerning the attack on our diplomatic and intelligence facilities in Benghazi, Libya; and, the brutal deaths of Ambassador Christopher Stephens, U.S. Foreign Service Officer Sean Smith, and security officers Ty Woods and Glen Doherty. To date, five (5) different committees of the House have conducted separate hearings, uncovering information in a piecemeal fashion lacking professional investigators. The five committees’ efforts are disjointed and uncoordinated. The Obama administration has benefited from that dysfunctional process to hide the truth. Hardly any Obama administration witnesses have testified – publicly or privately. You have resisted repeated calls for the creation of a select investigative committee with subpoena authority. It appears that you are satisfied to allow that state of investigative incoherence and ambiguity to continue. The last public hearing by any of the five committees was held in September – four (4) months ago. The families of the dead who fought valiantly to protect the mission and their families, the survivors, and the American people deserve better from you and your Members of Congress. They deserve the truth from their government. Your failure to get the truth and hold public officials accountable increases the possibility of other repeat attacks and additional failures to defend Americans abroad. On Sunday, December 29, 2013, the New York Times published a story concerning the Benghazi attacks that directly contradicts the sworn testimony of witnesses who appeared before various committees. Besides the obvious New York Times editorial and political objectives of inoculating Hillary Clinton and her 2016 presidential campaign from further criticism of her failures as Secretary of State, the story contradicts objective truth and established facts in a way that confuses the public. Your inaction and failure to lead on the Benghazi investigation directly contributes to the repetition of lies; a lack of accountability from responsible government officials; and the political advancement of persons who seek to continue to “fundamentally transform” the Constitution and our country. The New York Times recent publication proves the Benghazi story is not “going away.” Your oversight of the Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation has been without any meaningful effect or result. Not a single terrorist in this well-planned and executed military attack by radical Islamists has been apprehended. Ahmed Abu Khattala, a ringleader of the attack, granted long interviews to reporters in Benghazi cafes, while the Obama administration – and you – have done nothing. Nearly 16 months after the terrorist attack, the American public has no accountability and no plan of action from House leadership. The public is subjected to undisputed disinformation from a White House who calls the terror attack a “phony scandal.” While the White House repeats false and misleading information, you continue to ignore claims, documented by Rep. Frank Wolf, of intelligence officers being intimidated with multiple, punitive polygraph examinations and harassing non-disclosure agreement demands. If Benghazi is “phony” why are intelligence officers being threatened not to speak and subjected to polygraph exams? Why do you stand by passively? Some analysts believe your inaction and passivity towards getting to the truth concerning Benghazi is because you were briefed on the intelligence and special operations activities in Libya as a member of the “Super 8.” You may possess “guilty knowledge.” We recall how then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi developed a form of “amnesia” concerning a documented briefing she received on so-called “enhanced interrogation techniques” – later termed “torture” for political purposes. Are you in the same position as your predecessor? Are you dodging a legitimate, thorough, coordinated investigation of Benghazi because it will damage your political position as Speaker? You should be embarrassed that members of Congress, and your own party, are forced to file Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests with Obama administration agencies to get basic information about the Benghazi issue. What a sad and pathetic statement about the operations of House standing committees looking into this tragedy that FOIA has become the last resort of even Republican Members seeking the truth. Are you concerned that the scattershot and untimely efforts of the various committees may actually be doing more harm than good at documenting facts? These are all examples of Republican leadership failures. How are you accountable? Rep. Mike Rogers and the Intelligence Committee seem to act as defense counsel for the Obama administration. A recent Intelligence Committee weekly update note stated as fact that no arms shipments were being run from Libya, and that no intelligence officers were being coerced not to speak. There is substantial evidence to the contrary on both counts. Why does Rep. Rogers parrot the discredited falsehoods of the so-called “Accountability Review Board” (ARB)? Conflicting accounts, testimony and evidence need to be investigated – not dismissed or ignored. Don’t those contradictions and questions compel you, on behalf of the American people, to take any action to resolve the matter and get to the truth? Aren’t you concerned that General Carter Ham was suddenly and prematurely recalled from AFRICOM, and then made statements at the Aspen Institute that directly contradicted the Obama administration’s position on the nature of the attack in Benghazi? Why has General Ham not testified publicly before one of the House committees? The New York Times story reports that the CIA was, in fact, collecting weapons in Benghazi. If true, why was the CIA running a separate, parallel weapons program from the State Department’s 40 million dollar collection effort? Where did the CIA-purchased weapons go? Is the Obama administration arming al Qaeda affiliated jihadists in Syria? If you wished, you could have publicly engaged Rep. Devin Nunes concerning his November 6, 2013 letter to you, addressing the nine unanswered questions about Benghazi. Instead, there was thundering silence from your office. You have an opportunity to show strong leadership and resolve a national disgrace perpetrated by specific public officials. You are failing. Your reluctance to lead and resistance to create a Select Committee on Benghazi must end. More than 75% of all House Republicans – with the conspicuous absence of those in leadership or committee chairmen – have cosponsored Rep. Wolf’s Select Committee bill. Few bills in this Congress demonstrate such overwhelming support from Republicans. Additionally, the bill enjoys the support of national security advocacy groups, and the Wall Street Journal editorial board, among many others. We urge you to bring the bill to the floor for a vote immediately to start effective oversight on this critical national security matter immediately. We have waited long enough. Your approach is not working. Mr. Speaker, we call upon you to act now and create a Select Committee on Benghazi to investigate all aspects of the United States involvement in Libya, to include, but not be limited to the attacks of September 11, 2012. It must now also include the protracted cover-up the American people, the families of the fallen and those with loved ones serving overseas have endured. The new committee must have subpoena power, capable staff and Members from both parties who are committed to finding the truth, not playing politics. The Committee must be staffed with new, professional, qualified and experienced investigators. It must have resources to conduct a thorough, comprehensive investigation and issue an exhaustive report before this Congress adjourns. Sincerely, The Undersigned: (Titles for identification purposes only) Charles Woods, Father of Ty Woods Pat Smith, Mother of Sean Smith Michael Ingmire, Musician/Writer, Uncle to Sean Smith and Adm. Jerome L. Johnson, USN Ret., former Vice Chief of Naval Operations Lt. Gen. E.G. “Buck” Shuler, Jr., USAF, (Ret) Lt. Gen. Richard D. Lawrence, USA (Ret) LTG William G. Boykin, USA (Ret) Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely, USA Ret, Chairman, Stand Up America Maj. Gen. Carroll D. Childers, USA (Ret), Ranger Maj. Gen. Thomas F. Cole, USA (Ret) Maj. Gen. Richard M. Cooke, USMC (Ret) Amb. Henry F. Cooper, Former Director, Strategic Defense Initiative LTC Allen B. West (US Army, Ret) former Congressman, FL Capt Joseph R. John, USNA ‘62, USN (Ret), Chairman, Combat Veterans For Congress PAC Debra Burlingame, Co-founder, 9/11 Families for a Safe and Strong America Elaine Donnelly, President, Center for Military Readiness Dick Brauer, Col, USAF (Ret), Special Operation Speaks Tom Fitton, President, Judicial Watch Allen Roth, Secure America Now Joel A. Arends, Veterans for a Strong America Ginni Thomas, President, Liberty Consulting Catherine Engelbrecht, President, True the Vote Anita MonCrief, Black Voters Alliance David Wallace, Restore America's Mission Dr. James Pollock, Maj., USAF (Ret), OIF VETx2, SOCOM, Wounded Warrior Congressional Advocate John J. Molloy, Chairman, National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition James C. Harding, Col USAF (Ret) National Spokesman for Veteran Defenders of America Diane M. Sendlenski, Veteran US Air Force, Special Operations Speaks Coordinator John G. B. Howland, Publisher, USNA-At-Large Katherine Cornell Gorka, Executive Director, The Westminster Institute Paul Caprio, Executive Director, Family Pac Federal William L. Walton, Chairman, Rappahannock Ventures LLC Sandy Rios, Director of Governmental Affairs, American Family Association David Horowitz, President, Freedom Center Peter Thomas, Chairman, The Conservative Caucus Rear Adm. Hugh P. Scott, MC, USN (Ret) Rear Adm. Bill McDaniel, USN (Ret) Rear Adm. John A. Moriarty, USN, (Ret) Rear Adm. Robert B. McClinton, USN (Ret) Rear Adm. Don G. Primeau, USN (Ret) Brig. Gen. Michael Neil, USMCR (Ret) Brig. Gen. Francis Hughes, USA (Ret) Brig. Gen. John Zierdt, Jr., USA (Ret) Brig. Gen. Michael T. Byrnes, USA (Ret) Brig. Gen. William A. Bloomer, USMC (Ret) Captain Larry Bailey, USN (Ret), Special Operation Speaks Captain Kenneth Rauch, USN (Ret) Captain Peter A. Hewett, JAGC, U.S. Navy (Ret) Captain James Knight, USN (Ret) Captain Roger W. Barnett, USN (Ret) Captain Gregory Streeter, USN (Ret) USNA ’58 Col. G. Huntington Banister, USA (Ret), and former Acting Director, Selective Service System, 1994 Col. S. Badiner, USMC (Ret) Col. Gregory G. Raths, USMC (Ret) Col. Joseph V. Potter, USAF (Ret) Col. Rob Maness, USAF (Ret), U.S. Senate Candidate 2014, R-Louisiana Dan Bongino, 2012 Republican Nominee for US Senate, MD Lt. Col. Ken Benway, USA (Ret), Special Operation Speaks Lt. Col. Dennis B. Haney, USAF (Ret) CDR Randolph J. Horhutz, USNA '61, SC, USN (Ret) Everett Woolum, CMSGT, USAF (Ret) Gregory J. Rose, USNA '73 Thomas Corboy, USNA, ‘61 Anthony R. Papandrea, USNA ‘61 Raymond H. Clary, Jr., USNA ‘65 John W. Slagle, U.S. Navy Aviation veteran (Ret) Special Agent U.S.B.P. Anti-Smuggling Unit Sarah Folger White, Former Presidential Commissioner Dick and Patricia Schermerhorn, Appleton, WI Lee Boyland, Author, former military officer, entrepreneur, nuclear engineer Susan Creed Percy, Advocate for Military Families Dave Hollenbeck, retired CA Highway Patrol Paul F. Wirtz, Military family, OH resident John Lillywhite, U.S. Citizen Gene Andrews, U. S. Citizen Mrs. Nancy Olbert, Supervisor Criminal Advocates, Daytona, FL State Attorney Office Dr. Frank Ingels, Military Defense Consultant, MSIC/TETRA Office Robert M. Trent, Senior Special Agent, USINS and former Marine and Vietnam combat veteran Kelly Monroe Kullberg, Christians for a Sustainable Economy; OH resident

Roe vs Wade, The worst law in America.

This comes from Training Children with Grace and Truth Facebook Page. https://www.facebook.com/GraceandTruthBooks

For tomorrow: the 41st anniversary of Roe vs. Wade, the most barbaric decision in the history of American law. A worried woman visits her gynecologist: “Doctor, I have a serious problem and desperately need your help! My baby is not even one year old and I'm pregnant again. I don't want kids so close together.” Doctor: “Ok, and what do you want me to do?” Woman: “I want you to end my pregnancy, and I'm counting on your help with this.” The doctor thought for a little, and after a pause, said to the lady: “I think I have a better solution for your problem. It's less dangerous for you too.” She smiled, thinking that the doctor was going to accept her request. He continued: “You see, in order for you not to have to take care of two babies at the same time, let's kill the one in your arms. This way, you could rest some before the other one is born. If we're going to kill one of them, it doesn't matter which one it is. There would be no risk for your body if you chose the one in your arms.” The lady was horrified and said: “No, doctor! How terrible! It's a crime to kill a child!” “I agree”, the doctor replied. “But you seemed to be OK with it, so I thought maybe that was the best solution.” The doctor smiled, realizing that he had made his point. He convinced the mom that there is no difference in killing a child that's already been born and one that's still in the womb. The crime is the same! Proverbs 6: Of the six things “the Lord hates”, which “are an abomination unto Him”, one of them is: HANDS THAT SHED INNOCENT BLOOD. Pray for the overthrow of Roe vs. Wade: The abomination of January 22, 1973 continues....

No wonder why Obama is afraid of Fox News.

Via: Barack Obama's Dead Fly

No wonder why Obama is afraid of Fox News. He realizes Fox viewers are much better informed (HL)

Obama is blaming Fox News for 2/3 of the country disliking Obamacare. Here's Neal Cavuto's explanation and it is great. If you don't understand what is bad about ObamaCare please read his comments and you will understand.

Mr. President, Fox News isn't what's making Americans sick about your healthcare law. Your healthcare law is. Welcome, everybody, I'm Neil Cavuto. And excuse this departure from form. But I think this is just poor form. So, it's time we set some things straight.

Mr. President, we at Fox News are not the problem. I hate to break it to you, sir. You are. Your words are. Your promises are. We didn't sell this healthcare law. Sir, you did. Remember this?

President Barack Obama: If you like your doctor, you will be able to keep your doctor. Period.

Mr. President, tell that to tens of thousands of retirees at IBM and Time Warner and dozens of others, who've been dumped from their coverage and told to find their own coverage, Fox News didn't break that news to them, Mr. President. Their companies did.

Fox News didn't push more of those firms to hire part-time workers. Your healthcare law did. Fox News didn't incentivize fast food restaurants to scale back their benefits. Your healthcare law did. Fox News didn't make doctors want to opt out. Your healthcare law did. Fox News didn't make insurance premiums sky rocket. Your healthcare law did. Just like Fox News didn't grant hundreds of exemptions to companies that needed them. You did. And Fox News didn't delay one key provision after another, including online enrollment for those small business exchanges. You did.

Just like it wasn't Fox News that said we had to pass this to see what was in this. You did. Or was that Nancy Pelosi? Sometimes I'm confused. But of this I am not. Fox News didn't re-do basic math. Sir, you did. Fox News didn't say you can cover 30 million more Americans and not see a hit in premiums. You did. Fox News didn't say you could throw in those with pre-existing conditions and not have to pay for it. You did. Fox News didn't all but say you could get something for nothing. You did. Fox News didn't come back years later and say, oh yea, we did raise some taxes. You did.

Here's where you are right about Fox News, however, Mr. President. We can do math. And did. You cannot. And did not. We said it, and proved it. You didn't. And we're all suffering for it. Take it from the numbers guy at Fox. Numbers don't lie. The number of Americans working part-time and nervous. The number of retirees days away from being dumped on exchanges and anxious. The number of company bosses with any news to pass along on those exchanges, but still clueless. The number of doctors who want out. The number of congressmen now opting out. No, Mr. President, none of those numbers lie.

But with all due respect sir, I can only conclude you do know; I know, I know you hate us at Fox. But please take a look in a mirror, and fast. You think we're the skunk at your picnic. But that doesn't mean we're the ones that stink. Because that smell isn't coming from the folks reporting on your law. Mr. President, that smell is your law.